TI Launchpad 1.4 vs 1.5 pin swappery

Everyone knows that AVR is the king of open-hardware/hobbyist hill, as well as one of the most available MCU family, with most popular MCUs easily sourceable around the world in the nearest half-decent electronic component shop/martetplace. Why would you want to swap Arduino-thingy for something else? Many factors would need to play for that to happen, like price, availability again, and some issues with AVR.

Texas Instruments with Launchpad devel board for MSP430 value line pushes edge on price and availability, shipping candy to almost any country in the world for unbelievable price. And one of the issue I had with AVR MCU is inconsistency in their implementation (pin and register maps), which complicates MCU upgrade and code portability among the models.

So, MSP430 delivered with Launchpad felt like fresh air, and overall pretty cleverly and attentively designed MCU. Well, as folks who watch that space know, TI replaces the original Launchpad 1.4 model which shipped with MSP430G2231 with 1.5, shipping with MSP430G2553, without changing the price, which felt like generous move, and their desire to become real Arduino competetor.

Well, one of the issue which came with 1.5 was that it turns out that MSP430G2553 uses swapped assignment of RXD & TXD pins in its hardware UART comparing to (completely software-based) UART implementation with MSP430G2231. That could raise some eyebrows: because 1) couldn't Launchpad designers be attentive and design it originally as being compatible with entire MSP430G family (i.e. use hardware UART pin assignment right away); 2) if it really happens that MSP430G2553 was designed after Launchpad 1.4, couldn't TI engineers be so attentive to be compatible with existing UART pin assignment in their advertisement product, based on which quite a few people may judge entire MSP430 family.

But OK, stuff happens. TI was kind enough to provide a workaround to swap pins using a jumper trick. And well, you mostly use UART to communicate with "big" computer, so that jumper there was the only thing need.

And few days ago I ported my code to communicate with an SPI device (using a shield) from G2231 to G2553. First issue is that former vs latter use completely different SPI (etc.) communication controllers - USI vs USCI (yup, could have been named clearly to emphasize their difference). So, I was hit by the same issue I blamed on AVR - well, there at least if there's SPI controller, it works the same, even if some register addresses/bits might be different.

But once I ported software, I still couldn't get my device working, and it took few hours to check thru datasheets and manuals to find out that G2231 vs G2553 have also MOSI vs MISO pins swapped! Now, that's something to really frown about. It's not some random software-emulated UART pins misplaced on G2231 and corrected on G2553. In case of SPI, both MCUs have hardware SPI, so swapping pins is just that - big unfriendly "surprise" delivered in hardware developer's face. It would be too naive to think that it again happened by accident or mistake - conspiracy theorist would say it was carefully managemented and engineered incompatibility within family, designed to make users keep buying old low-power stuff and disallow easier upgrades. It's pure wonder they didn't get an idea to swap VCC and GND - indeed why not, few hundreds/thousands MCUs/devices burnt, and happy customers come back to buy more.

Aftermath of SPI swap is actually more serious than UART swap - again, UART is mostly used to connect to host, so you can set needed jumper position on it and forget (scalable solution is to keep using software UART and original pin assignment, as hardware UART is absent on quite a few devices and Launchpad is limited to 9600 baud anyway). But SPI is peripheral interface and the whole idea of Arduino and which TI also seems to push to Launchpad is extension modules aka shields. And SPI swappery means if you "just" make a shield for SPI device, it won't compatible with either old or new device (on hardware level). Would be pretty serious issue for folks who try to support Launchpad ecosystem, but surprisingly I found only one post on the issue, which again, means that folks are not aware, and unhappy customers may follow.

So, it's hard to say if TI should be blamed or vice-versa, thanked for being fare and show with Launchpad not only boons, but also drawbacks of MSP430 family. What's important are lessons learned (not just with this case, but with few other Launchpad hiccups):

1. Launchpad is not an Arduino.
2. Launchpad will not be an Arduino.
3. If you want nicely-working and user-friendly devel board, Arduino is always there.
4. If you want something cheap, Launchpad so far there too.
5. Expect Launchpad to bring issues and surprises, and break with new versions (ultimately, its price may break).
6. MSP430 is unlikely to displace AVR.
7. If you want to try MS430, check its availability. For example, in this part of the world, it's not possible to source small quantities of MSP430 value line, because well, nobody will get an idea to replace trusty ATtiny, so it makes no sense to bring them to shops. And nobody would get an idea to replace ATtiny because:
8. "Didn't break - didn't fix it." If ATtiny can do it, why bother with something else. That's not just inertness of thought, which industry/experienced people possess, that's actually proved by experience, as we saw. To change that, new product should do it much better than existing, but MSP430 doesn't want to do that.